On 10/15/14 3:25 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote:
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 3:37 AM, Chris Hofmann <chofm...@mozilla.com> wrote:
Now that we have a strategy for putting developer tools in there own release
What's that strategy? It could be very bad for us if Dev Tools didn't
"just work" for Web devs because they downloaded a non-developer
build, when Dev Tools "just work" in Chrome and IE.
On the topic of browser features implemented using HTML+JS:
We should probably be more careful about importing JS libraries
developed for Web use, because code paths for other browsers or legacy
versions of Firefox are bloat in JS libs used inside Firefox. See, for
example, Loop including a polyfill for TextDecoder/TextEncoder (which
we have a built-in implementation of):
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1071536
Bug 977292 - On demand application components
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=977292
Paradigm shift for Mozilla, but 10 out of 10 engineers agree: rm has a
better compression ratio than any algorithm.
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
