On 28/01/2015 01:29, Martin Thomson wrote: > On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 2:51 AM, Daniel Stenberg <dan...@haxx.se> wrote: > >> I personally think it would be wrong to do it in connection with HTTP/2 >> since it'll bring a bunch of unrelated breakage to be associated with the >> protocol bump. > > > I'd rather we didn't for similar reasons. > > If we're interested in this, maybe run an experiment where Nightly offers a > User-Agent of just "Nightly". See how that goes. I don't expect much > success unfortunately; UA detection is still in pretty wide use, and not > always for the wrong reasons (you won't have to search back far on > mozilla-google-discuss for an example).
Pale Moon tried to do something similar. It was rather impressive how much of the web breaks when you do that. That change was backed out in haste. Phil -- Philip Chee <phi...@aleytys.pc.my>, <philip.c...@gmail.com> http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief, oh Night, and so be good for us to pass. _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
