The W3C is proposing revised charters for nearly all of the working groups in the Web Accessibility Initiative (all except Independent User Interface):
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2015Feb/0007.html Accessible Platform Architectures Working Group (APA WG) (Formerly the Protocols and Formats Working Group) http://www.w3.org/2012/10/draft-pfwg-charter Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group (WCAG WG) http://www.w3.org/2013/04/draft-wcag-charter Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines Working Group (ATAG WG) http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2013/draft_auwg_charter.html User Agent Accessibility Guidelines Working Group (UAWG) http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/2013/draft_uawg_charter Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG) http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/charter5.html Education and Outreach Working Group (EOWG) http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2013/charter6 Research and Development Working Group (RDWG) http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/charter4.html WAI Interest Group (WAI IG) http://www.w3.org/WAI/IG/charter5.html WAI Coordination Group (WAI CG) http://www.w3.org/WAI/CG/charter5.html Mozilla has the opportunity to send comments or objections through Monday, March 23. Please reply to this thread if you think there's something we should say as part of this charter review, or whether you think we should explicitly abstain. (Note that we can only explicitly abstain from the set of charters as a whole, not individually, at least on the ballot form, though I suppose we could do so in prose.) -David -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling in or walling out, And to whom I was like to give offense. - Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
