[re-sending with Marcos actually Cc’ed this time] Marcos, if you’ve not been following along already, full context starts at https://lists.mozilla.org/pipermail/dev-platform/2015-May/010149.html
Anne van Kesteren <ann...@annevk.nl>, 2015-06-02 08:31 +0900: > On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 5:09 AM, Jonas Sicking <jo...@sicking.cc> wrote: > > We should use whatever formats people are using to mark up pages. If that is > > microdata we should use that. If it's RDF we should use that. If its JSONLD > > we should use that. > > > > The API that is used to extract the data is irrelevant. That will be an > > internal API anyway. Effectively we should think of the browser api as an > > internal api. There is no way it will be standardized in any relevant > > timeframe. > > Sure, but if our project has any success any competitor would have to > reverse engineer this mess. Which seems sad. As came up in some off-list discussion with Anne, is the “Manifest for a web application” spec at https://w3c.github.io/manifest/ not relevant here? (Nothing to reverse engineer, since it has an actual spec—with defined processing requirements—and at least one other browser-engine project is also contributing to it and implementing it.) —Mike -- Michael[tm] Smith https://people.w3.org/mike
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
