On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 8:12 AM, Dave Townsend <dtowns...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 7:27 AM, Eric Rescorla <e...@rtfm.com> wrote: > > More generally, I keep seeing comments (especially from GPS) about > > trying to push people towards some workflow that's different from the > > patch-based workflow that's the modal bugzilla workflow that I suspect > > most people now use. That doesn't seem like an especially valuable > > goal for this work. > > I disagree. The workflow everyone is used to is the workflow that > bugzilla essentially forces on us. Given the choice is it the workflow > everyone would use? For some maybe but given how many people I see > using mozreview now (even though it still has its problems) when the > old workflow is still perfectly usable suggests that this new workflow > is preferable to many and so this work is valuable. Some issues aside > I find it much more more straightforward to use. > It's important to separate issues of workflow from issues of UI. I still prefer Mozreview for significant-sized Gecko patches despite the general clunkiness of the workflow because ReviewBoard is so much better at showing what changed than splinter is. But when I have a choice (e.g., for isolated projects like NSS) I use Rietveld and when it's small I use Splinter, because I find them generally easier to work with. -Ekr _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
