On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 4:33 AM, Philip Chee <philip.c...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 26/02/2016 22:45, Andrew Halberstadt wrote:
> > To date, our continuous integration has been setting
> > 'xpinstall.signatures.required=false' to bypass addon signing. But
> > soon, this pref will become obsolete and Firefox will enforce signing
> > no matter what.
> >
> > In preparation, we will begin signing extensions that are used in
> > our test automation. If you maintain one of these addons, it means
> > you will be required to re-sign it everytime a change is made. For
> > more information on what this means, how to sign addons or how to
> > bypass signing completely, see the following document:
> > https://wiki.mozilla.org/EngineeringProductivity/HowTo/SignExtensions
> >
> >  Let me know if you have any questions or concerns, Andrew
>
> We were promised that trunk and aurora builds would not enforce addon
> signing when xpinstall.signatures.required=false. I did not see any
> discussion about rescinding this commitment.
>

We also run automation on release-channel builds to test the bits we ship...


> Phil
>
> --
> Philip Chee <phi...@aleytys.pc.my>, <philip.c...@gmail.com>
> http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org
> Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief,
> oh Night, and so be good for us to pass.
> _______________________________________________
> dev-platform mailing list
> dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
>
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to