On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 11:11 PM, Xidorn Quan <quanxunz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Lawrence Mandel <lman...@mozilla.com> > wrote: > >> On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Mike Hommey <m...@glandium.org> wrote: >> >> > On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 05:18:17PM -0500, Adam Roach wrote: >> > > On 5/3/16 4:59 PM, Justin Dolske wrote: >> > > > On 5/3/16 12:21 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > * The update server has been reconfigured to not serve Nightly >> > > > > updates to >> > > > > 10.6-10.8 (bug 1269811) >> > > > >> > > > Are we going to be showing some kind of notice to affected users >> upon >> > > > Release? That is, if I'm a 10.6 user and I update to Firefox 48, at >> > some >> > > > point should I see a message saying I'll no longer receive future >> > > > updates? >> > > >> > > Even better, is there any way to get the update system to >> automatically >> > move >> > > such users over to 45ESR? >> > >> > Did we introduce changes to profile data between 45 and 48? Because >> > that usually breaks downgrade paths. >> > >> >> We discussed this earlier and decided that we were not going to >> automatically move users from Firefox to ESR. For one thing, the user has >> not opted to be on this channel. A channel change also involves both >> engineering and test work. It does seem prudent to test the scenario to >> know whether users can move from 47 to ESR 45.2.0 without issue. > > > Is it feasible to make 48 an ESR as well so that we don't need to ask > users to downgrade it to ESR 45? > I don't think so. I also don't know that we're going to recommend that users migrate to ESR (need to verify that there are no incompatible profile changes) although that is certainly an option. Lawrence _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
