Am Freitag, 13. Mai 2016 10:34:59 UTC+2 schrieb bo...@mozilla.com: > On Thursday, 12 May 2016 21:36:53 UTC+1, Chris Peterson wrote: > > Yes. Flash and Silverlight both have 64-bit plugins that work in 64-bit > > Firefox. Streaming video services will likely move their Firefox users > > from Silverlight to Widevine this year, so Silverlight usage will > > decline by EOY. > > As Flash Player doesn't provide Protected Mode for 64-bit, we've enabled our > own sandbox. > Unfortunately this causes some regressions as the Flash DLL was never > designed to be sandboxed when run in process like this. We'd like to > strengthen the policy, but that breaks too many things. > > So, we'd have to think carefully before deciding who we could move. > > > On 5/12/16 1:10 PM, Ryan VanderMeulen wrote: > > > Flash installs the 32-bit and 64-bit plugin versions side by side > > > already (in System32 and SysWOW64, respectively), so I don't think > > > that's an issue here. > > Confusingly the 64-bit version lives in System32 and the 32-bit version in > SysWOW64. > This is Microsoft's confusion not Adobe's. > SysWOW64 generally contains files used for running 32-bit binaries on 64-bit > Windows (WOW64 is Windows [32-bit] On Windows 64[-bit]) > System32 is just a legacy naming hangover as I understand, because too many > application depended on it.
system = 16-bit System32 = 32-bit SysWOW64 = 64-bit (Or I have no clue where else the 64-bit-dlls get stored...) _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
