On 3/1/17 5:03 PM, Kip Gilbert wrote:
We have worked directly with the other WebVR platform implementers to ensure
compatibility.
OK, but what is the actual state of that compatibility?
https://github.com/w3c/webvr/issues/197#issuecomment-283492774 and
https://github.com/w3c/webvr/issues/195#issuecomment-283493130 sure
sound like at least Brandon is not on board with those parts of the
current API, and he's one of the spec editors.
We have regularly scheduled video calls and F2F meetings to improve the spec
and remove any ambiguity. We have formed a W3C community working group.
That's good. The question that bothers me is how this interacts with
the ship schedule.
[1] For example, what does the VRFrameData constructor actually do? The spec
doesn't define it at all. Where is the VRPose inside supposed to come from?
What values will it contain? I filed https://github.com/w3c/webvr/issues/195
on this, but note that I've spent all of about 5 minutes skimming the spec and
ran into this. I have _not_ done a careful read looking for possible interop
problems...
VRFrameData is described as receiving the output of the VRDisplay.getFrameData
function:
Yes, but that's totally unrelated to my question about what the
_constructor_ does....
-Boris
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
