>2017-10-30 19:19 GMT+01:00 Kris Maglione <kmagli...@mozilla.com>:
>
>> Our static analysis tools are pretty good at catching a lot of lambda
>> capture bugs at this point, though. I'd be much less comfortable using them
>> if they weren't.
>>
>> It's probably worth considering whether we need to write static analysis
>> tools for a new feature before we turn it on, though...
>
>We can probably help with introducing more static analysis to avoid
>incorrect usages of C++{11,14,17} features.Sure - but in most cases we've only realized that a static-analysis bit was needed after hitting and solving a few (or a bunch of) crashes/sec bugs -- static-analysis tends to be reactive. -- Randell Jesup, Mozilla Corp remove "news" for personal email _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
