Hi all, On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 10:29 AM Sarah Clements <scleme...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> Nick, > > I want to clarify something I said in my previous email that might be > confusing: > > We currently process data from the jobInfo and extra.artifacts > properties of jobs we ingest (this goes into the JobDetails table). > > Disregard this, it's mostly specific to Treeherder (I think we're > primarily using extra.artifacts for Perfherder and I am cautious about > using it as a catch-all for random bits of information). An alternative for > surfacing whatever information is currently being parsed by TinderboxPrint > lines is to create a structured artifact (if, as I mentioned previously, > it's not stats that should be reported to Perfherder). If this doesn't work > for your scenario, we can pull in people more familiar with > tests/harnesses/etc to help figure out what you need and how to surface it > (:jmaher might be a good person to ask). > > When you get an idea of what you need to do, let me know an estimation of > your timeline. I can extend the deadline by another month or two (*just > for TinderboxPrint deprecation*) so everyone who needs to can get > alternatives implemented can. > To be clear: I don't need or expect an extension of this deadline. I'm not thrilled that we don't have a crisp answer to "what do I do instead", but I trust that the people closest to this problem -- namely, you -- are balancing things reasonably and I fully support the decision you are presenting. Best, Nick _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
