I think I have found an inconsistency in TB's pref setting during mochitest regarding e10s. The gory detail is in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1629433#c10

Major find (excerpt from the above bugzilla.)

--- begin quote ---
1) Dynamically generated user.js files during tests of C-C TB mochitest execution, contain conflicting stetting.

pref("browser.tabs.remote.autostart", {true|false});

The value is either true or false. Not consistent. In mochitest of C-C TB, there may be a few very browser-like test. In those cases, |browser.tabs.remote.autostart| can be true? However, if we ALWAYS need to set the value for false for C-C TB mochitest,

    >> // No e10s in Thunderbird for now.
    >> pref("browser.tabs.remote.autostart", false); <=== This

we may be in a big trouble.

I observe that there are multiple lines to set "browser.tabs.remote.autostart" in a user.js with different setting. Of course, the last one sets the used value. Inquiring mind wants to know how the setting is composed (presumably concatenate some settings prepackaged in user.js files in test file directories? I have noticed that there are user.js files in test directory. See (3) below.) Clear description of how the run-time user.js is created for each test during c-c TB mochitest run would be desirable.

In any case, I DID find cases where sub-tests (albeit web browser-oriented?) run with a user.js with |pref("browser.tabs.remote.autostart", true);| which may not sit well for C-C thunderbird binary.

I have a nagging feeling that this bad setting may/could be one of the causes of the failure to run valgrind because we need more than 1500+
threads to run the C-C TB mochitest(!)

(2) user.js file under MOZ_OBJ/temp, /NEW-SSD/moz-obj-dir/objdir-tb3/temp/user.js, does NOT set |pref("browser.tabs.remote.autostart", false);|

I wonder if this user.js in MOZ_OBJ directory is used or not during C-C mochitest. If it is used, I think we are in a big trouble since it does not set the value to false.

(3) There are a few |user.js| files with conflicting settings in the test directories. Some set the pref to false, but some set to true. I hope they are used appropriately. Since the C-C mochitest works more or less, I believe they are used correctly, but a clear documentation/explanation of how each is used and how each test creates user.js dynamically from the prepackaged user.js for TB
mochitest would be desirable.
--- end quote ---


So if the testing of web browser function in C-C TB mochitest runs with e10s enabled, then it is not testing the real world usage because
e10s is disabled for TB usually.
(OTOH, it is hard to believe that if TB needs to disable e10s, the built-in web renderer in TB can run with e10s enabled without disrupting the behavior of the rest of the code. Something is screwed up in dynamically generated mochitest user.js )

I hope someone familiar with C-C TB mochitest investigates this and figures if the current state of the affairs is correct or not.

Chiaki

On 2020/06/18 16:46, Magnus Melin wrote:
Currently Thunderbird doesn't work with e10s.

Longer term I'm assuming we'll need to do necessary adaptions so that we can - but I suspect this is a slightly larger project...

I've filed bug 1646648 to track this work.

 -Magnus

On 2020-06-10 22:05, Gijs Kruitbosch wrote:
I can't speak for Thunderbird's plans, but either way these plans shouldn't affect them and is restricted to desktop Firefox; the pref still works there: https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/rev/4bb2401ecbfce89af06fb2b4d0ea3557682bd8ff/toolkit/xre/nsAppRunner.cpp#5020-5024 , and they set it: https://searchfox.org/comm-central/rev/e62a0af3cba6e1c65b2d4be02d3fefce88cf3f8f/mail/app/profile/all-thunderbird.js#654

Of course, if TB needs this configuration then that may complicate removing support for non-e10s entirely...

~ Gijs

On 10/06/2020 19:56, Emilio Cobos Álvarez wrote:
What is the situation of Thunderbird? I think they don't have e10s enabled
yet, and it may be worth at least knowing what their plans are.

  -- Emilio

On Wed, Jun 10, 2020, 8:44 PM Dave Townsend <dtowns...@mozilla.com> wrote:

Non-e10s is such a different environment that I don't think we have any hope of keeping it working without running the full test suite in that mode
and I don't think anyone wants to do that. Now that this has started
breaking I think it is actively harmful to our users for us to allow them
to disable e10s.

On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 11:30 AM Gijs Kruitbosch <gijskruitbo...@gmail.com

wrote:

(Copied to fx-dev; Replies to dev-platform please.)

Hello,

Just over a year ago, I started a discussion[0] about our support for
disabling e10s. The outcome of that was that we removed support for
disabling e10s with a pref on Desktop Firefox with version 68, except
for use from automation. We kept support for using the environment
variable. [1]

Last week, we released Firefox 77, which turned out to break all
webpages sent using compression (like gzip) if you had disabled e10s
using this environment variable. [2]

So here we are again. I'd like to propose we also stop honouring the
environment variable unless we're running tests in automation. We
clearly do not have sufficient test coverage to guarantee basic things like "the browser works", it lacks security sandboxing, and a number of other projects require it (fission, gpu process, socket process, ...),
so I think it's time to stop supporting this configuration at all.

I hope to make this change for the 79 cycle. I'm open to arguments
either way about what to do for 78 esr (assuming the patch for 79 turns out to be simple; the work to remove the pref had a number of annoying
corner-cases at the time).

Please speak up if you think that this plan needs adjusting.

~ Gijs


[0]


https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.dev.platform/cJMzxi7_PmI/Pi1IOg_wCQAJ
[1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1548941
[2] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1638652
_______________________________________________
firefox-dev mailing list
firefox-...@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/firefox-dev

_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform



_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform


_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to