Hi,

I have a few questions:
- Are all those subordinate CAs part of the government?
- Do all audit criteria for approving the subordinate CA match
  those that are required by Mozilla?

If both of those are the case, I see no problem adding it.


Kurt

On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 07:52:20PM +0000, Brown, Wendy (10421) wrote:
> With full disclosure that I have applied for the US Federal Common Policy CA 
> to be included as a trust anchor (even though we haven't made it thru the 
> process yet).  I question the proposal to try and have all the 
> cross-certified or subordinate CAs individually apply to be trust anchors.  
> In the case of the US government this would defeat the purpose of trying to 
> get the Federal Common Policy CA in the trust store as the single trust 
> anchor for the US federal government.
> 
> We do publicly disclose all the CAs we have certified, we do require 
> independent audits of each and every CA, the Common Policy CP and a redacted 
> version of our CPS is publicly available as is the criteria for approving the 
> subordinate CAs, although they each have to have their own CPS which we have 
> mapped to the CP.  Not all of these subordinate CAs even operate a Root CA, 
> because they are supposed to be subordinate to the Federal Common Policy CA.
> 
> Those CAs that are cross-certified with the Federal Bridge CA (and therefore 
> have a valid path to the Federal Common Policy CA) operate under their own CP 
> and CPS, but their CP has to have been mapped to the Federal Bridge CP which 
> is again publicly available and they are required to undergo an annual PKI 
> audit which includes independent assessment that they are operating under a 
> CPS that maps to their CP and they are incompliance with the Memorandum of 
> Agreement with the Federal PKI Policy Authority.
> 
> Thanks,
> Wendy
> 
> Wendy Brown
> Protiviti Government Services
> 703-299-4705 (office)    703-965-2990 (cell)
> 
> wendy.br...@protiviti.com
> wendy.br...@fpki.gov
> 
> 
> 
> NOTICE: Protiviti is a global consulting and internal audit firm composed of 
> experts specializing in risk and advisory services. Protiviti is not licensed 
> or registered as a public accounting firm and does not issue opinions on 
> financial statements or offer attestation services. 
> 
> This electronic mail message is intended exclusively for the individual or 
> entity to which it is addressed. This message, together with any attachment, 
> may contain confidential and privileged information. Any views, opinions or 
> conclusions expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and 
> do not necessarily reflect the views of Protiviti Inc. or its affiliates. Any 
> unauthorized review, use, printing, copying, retention, disclosure or 
> distribution is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in 
> error, please immediately advise the sender by reply email message to the 
> sender and delete all copies of this message. Thank you.
> _______________________________________________
> dev-security-policy mailing list
> dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy
> 
_______________________________________________
dev-security-policy mailing list
dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy

Reply via email to