-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 04/25/2014 01:50 PM, Jan Lühr wrote:
> (i) I really hope, that you change your mind by doing revocations > for free and charge for re-keying. This will break the > issuing-revocation-cycle, too, while going safety first. This does not eliminate the perverse incentive to certificate holders. Revocation *and* reissuance need to be zero-cost in a circumstance like this -- **whether or not** the initial certificate was paid for. zw -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJTWrd/AAoJEJH8wytnaapkuKwQAKdWWJYzR9mU7feU7yiI57j5 yvzQY/Pe0N2hLCy6MviahdD+QjiRsHKSrgqring1DTgDEJ45aTcZXZddWe1zAMc6 wa43OyZH1hIEL12QWkarA/Qo/P2h08v4holfqy68ZzUKXx6VJhRBuzliewx1t1pJ kaVfQNxZnVKxX8LgVifJmi3wWvL6XzueHCE431gQN/epRFArI0HBiQSBdnQYB1W+ yU3yDR4dbopBGLT10DJdnUeUUxUgz/QG3RAtbtmpYf0j1U8/edHa5BT6A35ktAX5 ya6N/O+BYChbn93xBqLTiF83Vicql0NSMziv9k2W2gVkg9JO4QvyACKtxuqxAYSx gYIdkxzJnNDryrhW6T5wRxkr58D5rTukbzJeSBCfld0bmWcvR82c24Zb1C5oJQbN Yz6BpX2wKA9d94GP9P49VyouC2q4BHCqx8XUFUw0YIc9s0n4Wu2pp9Hfth/RceD7 d2sVkpv5FmI5Y4RPVJ0hQ+6si+OmBl/9N5oAplbOqrJ1VCMlQld3+UpBMiZWUkrl itG5/2LBfy5mEc9o8hXqljPM0oQW5PvirgZRMC3lbOCIEiiGl1j7kZnlbcCcd+0n EpUODP7eS1SlyMEGVXZoeGZV8XSVZjxq7bIfEdej4vVFKxH8TlCrC5DImaNw225d nJmgGMujAsC8c4Z2bqCX =Rz2F -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ dev-security-policy mailing list dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy
