I'm not sure I follow. Why should the inclusion process proceed before the updates are complete?
Original Message From: j...@letsencrypt.org Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2016 10:04 PM To: mozilla-dev-security-pol...@lists.mozilla.org Subject: Re: ISRG Root Inclusion Request On Wednesday, June 8, 2016 at 7:56:44 AM UTC-5, Peter Kurrasch wrote: > I have comments as well. I made it to only Section 3.2.1 before I decided I > have too many concerns about Let's Encrypt to include in a review of the CPS. > I'll raise them in a separate thread, so here are my comments on just this > CPS document. Hi Peter, We've reviewed your feedback, much of it is helpful. Thanks. We'll work on incorporating improvements based on it into the next revision of our CPS. We don't believe any of these items need to block inclusion, however. -- Josh Aas Executive Director Internet Security Research Group Let's Encrypt: A Free, Automated, and Open CA _______________________________________________ dev-security-policy mailing list dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy _______________________________________________ dev-security-policy mailing list dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy
