Sure, that works. Is the "in writing" part necessary? You might say instead "publicly accepted by Mozilla.", which would imply text on m.d.s.p or bugzilla that would necessarily be in writing, while also ensuring better visibility.
-- Eric On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 5:31 PM, Gervase Markham <g...@mozilla.org> wrote: > On 12/12/16 05:35, Eric Mill wrote: > > It's possible there are other edge cases out there that make blanket CC0 > or > > CC-BY nor practical. I think adding some catch-all text that allows for a > > solution ensuring no copyright-based restrictions of any kind would allow > > for the bit of flexibility those cases need. > > "Or other equally permissive licensing terms accepted by Mozilla in > writing"? > > Gerv > -- konklone.com | @konklone <https://twitter.com/konklone> _______________________________________________ dev-security-policy mailing list dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy
