On 16/12/2021 5:23 μ.μ., Moudrick Dadashov wrote:
Thank you, Pekka

At least the audit reports in the Repository require password. Please advise.


I managed to download and open all reports listed in https://cps.trust.telia.com/ under the "AUDIT REPORTS AND SEALS" section without any password issues.

Dimitris.

Thanks,
M.D.


On Thu, Dec 16, 2021, 09:44 [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:

    All other Telia CA public documentation is here:
    https://cps.trust.telia.com.  If you think that something is
    missing specify what. All links in Ben's initial announcement look
    good to me. There are no unnecessary password protections.

    tiistai 14. joulukuuta 2021 klo 19.51.31 UTC+2 [email protected] kirjoitti:

        Thank you, Pekka

        Before we can continue our discussion, could you please add
        any other documents relevant to this request? Make sure the
        documents are not password protected.

        I’ve been relying on the documents listed in Ben's initial
        announcement.

        Thanks,
        M.D.


        Sent from my Galaxy


        -------- Original message --------
        From: "[email protected]"
        <[email protected]>
        Date: 12/14/21 16:01 (GMT+02:00)
        To: [email protected]
        Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
        "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
        Subject: Re: FW: RE: Public Discussion: Inclusion of Telia
        Root CA v2

        >You clarified that Telia CA is a group function of virtual
        Telia CA team from many Telia affiliates, in the meantime
        Mozilla accepts only real CA with disclosed locations that
        were "included in the scope of the audit or should have been
        included in the scope of the audit, whether the inspection was
        physically carried out in person at each location, and which
        audit criteria were checked (or not checked) at each location".

        I don't understand your statements above that we are not real
        or not disclosed our locations or audit criteria. Telia CA is
        a real CA under Telia Finland Oyj which is affiliate company
        of Telia Company AB. This is clearly disclosed in our CPS
        1.3.1 using this wording: "The CA operating in compliance with
        this CPS is Telia CA. The legal entity responsible of Telia CA
        is Finnish company “Telia Finland Oyj” (BusinessID 1475607-9).
        Telia Finland Oyj is part of Swedish company “Telia Company
        AB” (BusinessID 5561034249)." Also our annual Webtrust audits
        clearly states that both countries have been in the audit
        scope. E.g. the last Webtrust report is using this wording:
        "... in providing its SSL and non-SSL Certification Authority
        (CA) services in Finland and Sweden, throughout the period 1
        April 2020 to 31 March 2021, Telia has: -disclosed its SSL
        ...". The Full Webtrust audit reports are available at links
        below. Auditors have every year visited physically both
        countries since 2005 to verify our all our operations. Also
        audit criteria (Webtrust and its versions) is clearly stated
        in our audit reports.

        >a) Is this audit material available somehere?

        Yes, latest:
        
https://support.trust.telia.com/download/CA/Telia-2020-2021-WebTrust-Auditor-Report-WTCA-20210628.pdf,
        
https://support.trust.telia.com/download/CA/Telia-2020-2021-WebTrust-Auditor-Report-WTBR-20210628.pdf

        >The documents provided under this request show that Telia
        Company AB is a PKI participant whose roles/responsibilities
        within the CA are not disclosed. I’d suggest in your answers
        to focus on Telia Company AB CA/RA functions/responsibilities
        rather than ownership details - BRs and Mozilla policy do not
        assume any privileges for owners, affiliates or groups - CA’s
        operational independence must be ensured and respected not
        only by its affiliates (including owners) but also by its own
        company management.

        I don't understand. All participants, locations and audit
        reports are disclosed on our public web pages Telia
        Certificate Services Repository
        <https://cps.trust.telia.com/>. Both RAs were included in the
        audits like explained above. Swedish RA may not be directly
        mentioned in CPS but none of our competitors is listing all
        their RA teams either. All our CA/RA employees are internal
        Telia persons. Telia Company AB hasn't any real CA/RA role,
        instead it is the owner of Telia Finland Oyj and thus
        indirectly owner of Telia CA. Audit reports show how all our
        CA/RA processes in all locations have passed audits with only
        minor deviations. Auditors also verify all locations and roles
        of all trusted persons.  Company management assertions show
        that Telia Company Management is behind Telia CA. Our CP/CPS
        documents describe our processes in very detailed level. I
        think that different Telia company roles and responsibilities
        should be already clear but if any more responsibility
        description is required I'm happy to provide such.


        >b) according to RFC 3647 BRs and Mozilla policy require CP
        and CPS, while this root has CPS only, correct?

        Incorrect. Our disclosed CP/CPS is both at the same time.
        Chapter 1.2 clearly states: "This CPS is also a CP for Telia
        OV, DV and Seal certificates.". In many CP/CPS chapters there
        is at first more general CP description and then below how
        Telia CA has implemented such things.

        >you explained that its a Telia group function with two
        participants Telia Finland Oyj and Cygate AB, however based on
        1) and the documents provided under this request, this CA has
        at least three PKI participants whose roles/responsibilities
        need to be disclosed.

        I don't understand what would be the third Telia CA/RA
        participant you are referring. Telia Company AB's role as the
        owner has been already covered in my previous comments. I
        don't think owner is any real CA/RA role. The only real
        (functional) roles belong to Telia Finland Oyj which has the
        legal responsibility of Telia CA and of the Finnish RA team
        and Cygate AB which has the legal responsibility of our
        Swedish RA team.

        >you explaned that "We use affiliate like BR defines it",
        sorry, but this is misunderstanding - in BRs affiliate is used
        in specific CA/RA operation contexts, so please be as specific
        as possible, what is the role of the affiliate you mentioned
        earlier - Telia Lithuania (legal name AB Telia Lietuva)?
        Telia Lithuania AB has no role in Telia CA/RA processes. Clear
        enough? They may be using Telia certificates there thus having
        "relying party" role.

        tiistai 14. joulukuuta 2021 klo 11.55.37 UTC+2
        [email protected] kirjoitti:

            Thanks, Pekka



            1) How/if Telia Company AB is (Sweden) involved in Telia
            Finland Oyj’s CA/RA operations?

            you clarified that Telia CA is a group function of virtual
            Telia CA team from many Telia affiliates, in the meantime
            Mozilla accepts only *real* CA with disclosed locations
            that were "/in//cluded in the scope of the audit or should
            have been included in the scope of the audit, whether the
            inspection was physically carried out in person at each
            location, and which audit criteria were checked (or not
            checked) at each location/".

            a) Is this audit material available somehere?

            The documents provided under this request show that Telia
            Company AB is a *PKI participant* whose
            roles/responsibilities within the CA are not disclosed.
            I’d suggest in your answers to focus on Telia Company AB
            CA/RA functions/responsibilities rather than ownership
            details - BRs and Mozilla policy do not assume any
            privileges for owners, affiliates or groups - CA’s
            operational independence must be ensured and respected not
            only by its affiliates (including owners) but also by its
            own company management.


            b) according to RFC 3647 BRs and Mozilla policy require CP
            and CPS, while this root has CPS only, correct?


            2) does "Telia CA Policy Management Team" mean Telia
            Finland Oyj?

            you explained that its a Telia group function with two
            participants Telia Finland Oyj and Cygate AB, however
            based on 1) and the documents provided under this request,
            this CA has at least three PKI participants whose
            roles/responsibilities need to be disclosed.


            3) what is "affiliate" in terms of specific CA/RA functions?

            you explaned that "We use affiliate like BR defines it",
            sorry, but this is misunderstanding - in BRs affiliate is
            used in specific CA/RA operation contexts, so please be as
            specific as possible, what is the role of the affiliate
            you mentioned earlier - Telia Lithuania (legal name AB
            Telia Lietuva)?


            Thanks,
            M.D.

            Sent from my Galaxy


            -------- Original message --------
            From: "[email protected]"
            <[email protected]>
            Date: 12/13/21 08:34 (GMT+02:00)
            To: [email protected]
            Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
            Subject: Re: FW: RE: Public Discussion: Inclusion of Telia
            Root CA v2

            1) How/if Telia Company AB is (Sweden) involved in Telia
            Finland Oyj’s CA/RA operations?

            The main company “Telia Company AB” is the owner of the
            other Telia organizations (aka companies aka subsidiaries
            aka affiliates). Telia Finland Oyj and Cygate AB are such
            subsidiaries. Within Telia Company group, each subsidiary
            is responsible for running the operations. Telia Finland
            Oyj is the legal entity running Telia CA operations. Telia
            employees from many Telia companies may belong to group
            functions that create systems for the whole Telia group.
            E.g. Telia CA is a group function so that persons in
            virtual Telia CA team come from many Telia affiliates and
            thus from many countries. Complex but big enterprises may
            work like this. To simplify a bit you can say that Telia
            Finland is running Telia CA using resources from many
            Telia affiliates. And all is owned by Telia Company AB.
            All Telia CA employees belong legally to one of the Telia
            affiliates.

             2) does "Telia CA Policy Management Team" mean Telia
            Finland Oyj?

            Telia CA Policy Management team is also a Telia group
            function like described above. Currently it has members
            from “Telia Finland Oyj” and “Cygate AB”.

             3) what is "affiliate" in terms of specific CA/RA functions?

            We use affiliate like BR defines it: “*Affiliate*: A
            corporation, partnership, joint venture or other entity
            controlling, controlled by, or under common control with
            another entity, or an agency, department, political
            subdivision, or any entity operating under the direct
            control of a Government Entity.” Resources to run CA/RA
            come from several Telia affiliates but CA belongs legally
            to Telia Finland Oyj. One RA belongs to and is run by
            Telia Finland Oyj and the other belongs to Cygate AB.

            maanantai 13. joulukuuta 2021 klo 0.28.41 UTC+2
            [email protected] kirjoitti:

                Forwarding to the list



                Sent from my Galaxy


                -------- Original message --------
                From: md <[email protected]>
                Date: 12/8/21 17:02 (GMT+02:00)
                To: "Lahtiharju, Pekka"
                <[email protected]>, Ben Wilson
                <[email protected]>
                Cc: "Liimatainen, Mika A."
                <[email protected]>, "Gholami, Ali"
                <[email protected]>
                Subject: RE: Public Discussion: Inclusion of Telia
                Root CA v2

                Good day, Pekka

                Let’s focus on information directly relevant to this
                CA. As you already explained, "Telia" is just a
                trademark used by Telia Finland Oyj, which is the CA -
                a legal entity behind this root inclusion request.

                You have also clarified that Telia Finland Oyj has two
                (undisclosed) RAs and a number of so called
                affiliates. We still need to understand:

                1) How/if Telia Company AB is (Sweden) involved in
                Telia Finland Oyj’s CA/RA operations?

                2) does "Telia CA Policy Management Team" mean Telia
                Finland Oyj?

                3) what is "affiliate" in terms of specific CA/RA
                functions?

                Thanks,
                M.D.



                Sent from my Galaxy

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to
            the Google Groups "[email protected]" group.
            To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
            from it, send an email to [email protected].
            To view this discussion on the web visit
            
https://groups.google.com/a/mozilla.org/d/msgid/dev-security-policy/3661305c-0adb-436d-a091-46234cb00a1dn%40mozilla.org
            
<https://groups.google.com/a/mozilla.org/d/msgid/dev-security-policy/3661305c-0adb-436d-a091-46234cb00a1dn%40mozilla.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the
        Google Groups "[email protected]" group.
        To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
        it, send an email to [email protected].
        To view this discussion on the web visit
        
https://groups.google.com/a/mozilla.org/d/msgid/dev-security-policy/280ffcc7-8afd-429b-9082-cadc167dd58an%40mozilla.org
        
<https://groups.google.com/a/mozilla.org/d/msgid/dev-security-policy/280ffcc7-8afd-429b-9082-cadc167dd58an%40mozilla.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
    Groups "[email protected]" group.
    To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
    send an email to [email protected].
    To view this discussion on the web visit
    
https://groups.google.com/a/mozilla.org/d/msgid/dev-security-policy/2572d036-b45c-4bea-b23b-3a0dfcf0de1en%40mozilla.org
    
<https://groups.google.com/a/mozilla.org/d/msgid/dev-security-policy/2572d036-b45c-4bea-b23b-3a0dfcf0de1en%40mozilla.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "[email protected]" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/mozilla.org/d/msgid/dev-security-policy/CAMMZRrxvjboFLvo%3DTa2ADZk88yZsa3b8O9YhwS738_8r%2Bj%3Dt9w%40mail.gmail.com <https://groups.google.com/a/mozilla.org/d/msgid/dev-security-policy/CAMMZRrxvjboFLvo%3DTa2ADZk88yZsa3b8O9YhwS738_8r%2Bj%3Dt9w%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"[email protected]" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/mozilla.org/d/msgid/dev-security-policy/06d1b76d-28b3-b689-ff95-5a817bb86d97%40it.auth.gr.

Reply via email to