How about "no-user" as a source expression in script-src, instead?

On 12 April 2012 14:42, Tanvi Vyas <ta...@mozilla.com> wrote:

> Given recent social-engineering attacks, firefox no longer allows
> javascript in the address bar (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/**
> show_bug.cgi?id=656433<https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=656433>).
>  The same issue could exist with the Web Console.  An attacker could ask a
> user to use the keyboard shortcut to open the web console and copy and
> paste javascript on a page that is vulnerable to DOM based or self XSS.
>
> To mitigate this potential attack, we are considering adding a new CSP
> directive 'no-user-js' that can be set by websites being targeted by this
> attack (http://incompleteness.me/**mozblog/2011/12/14/combating-**
> self-xss/<http://incompleteness.me/mozblog/2011/12/14/combating-self-xss/>
> ):
> X-Content-Security-Policy: no-user-js
>
> Developers who want to use the Web Console to test their sites on websites
> that have set 'no-user-js' would have a preference to override the
> 'no-user-js' directive.  For websites that have not set 'no-user-js',
> developers would see no change to Web Console.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> ~Tanvi
> ______________________________**_________________
> dev-security mailing list
> dev-security@lists.mozilla.org
> https://lists.mozilla.org/**listinfo/dev-security<https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security>
>
_______________________________________________
dev-security mailing list
dev-security@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security

Reply via email to