> But, also, if a certificate feature isn't important enough for mobile*, then > why is it important for desktop? We should be striving for platform parity > here.
Please, that is not sane logic. The best should be strived for on each platform. Firefox mobile is great and perhaps the only secure mobile browser with all the webkit ones being constantly out of date and insecure (forcefully on Apple but also on Android). One of the main reasons I stick with firefox (aside from noscript and it's comprehensive about:config) is the refusal to add a clear on exit feature to Chrome. I wonder why. It is annoying this will never be on mobile firefox (on android atleast) just as it is annoying every time I kill firefox to close it. Developer defaults to solve the lack of memory problem is one thing. Developer wishes over users wishes is rediculous (startup apps, running apps etc..). -- _______________________________________________________________________ 'Write programs that do one thing and do it well. Write programs to work together. Write programs to handle text streams, because that is a universal interface' (Doug McIlroy) _______________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ dev-security mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security
