On 04/11/15 11:12, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
Well sure, I agree that taking mochitests as the input to a test-writing
effort is a good idea. I see this as being very different to blindly
shimming mochitests into the wpt harness. Having said that, however, I
don't think people have complained a lot about lack of test coverage from
wpt except in the areas that it doesn't cover at all i.e. dynamic changes
to layout, or other human interaction.
To pick a couple of areas I work on: for CSSOM-Views for example there is
practically no coverage at all. The media tests are better but still very
limited compared to what we test in mochitests.
It would be great to have a record of some areas where we know that
web-platform-tests has missing coverage; we occasionally get people
looking for areas where they can make useful test contributions and
asking what's required. Can you file some issues on GitHub, possibly
pointing to the relevant mochitests that we could draw from?
_______________________________________________
dev-servo mailing list
dev-servo@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-servo
