On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 12:44 AM, James Graham <ja...@hoppipolla.co.uk> wrote:
> On 04/11/15 11:41, Robert O'Callahan wrote: > >> The media tests are better than I thought --- I found more. They don't >> test >> the variety of problematic media files that our mochitests do, but maybe >> that's not in scope? Should we be worried that regressions in the media >> stack seldom trigger W test failures on mozilla-inbound but often trigger >> mochitest failures? >> > > I consider anything that might affect browser interop or quality in-scope, > as long as it can be run cross-browser and it's clear what the expected > result is. OK: https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/issues/2305 Rob -- lbir ye,ea yer.tnietoehr rdn rdsme,anea lurpr edna e hnysnenh hhe uresyf toD selthor stor edna siewaoeodm or v sstvr esBa kbvted,t rdsme,aoreseoouoto o l euetiuruewFa kbn e hnystoivateweh uresyf tulsa rehr rdm or rnea lurpr .a war hsrer holsa rodvted,t nenh hneireseoouot.tniesiewaoeivatewt sstvr esn _______________________________________________ dev-servo mailing list dev-servo@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-servo
