>>>>> "Joshua" == Joshua Cranmer <[email protected]> writes:
Joshua> I have a feeling that the available tools for Java static analysis Joshua> would be much easier to extend and develop, especially as gcj still Joshua> has some problems working with newer Java code, AFAIK. Just for the record, these days gcj only reads Java bytecode. Parsing of .java file is outsourced to the Eclipse compiler. All bytecode is supported; typical issues when using gcj involve classes missing from the standard class library. That said, if I were doing static analysis of Java, I would not try to use gcj. It is simpler to either put code into an existing compiler (Eclipse or the JDK's), or to use one of the existing analysis frameworks (FindBugs, or roll your own with ASM). Tom _______________________________________________ dev-static-analysis mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-static-analysis
