Joshua Cranmer wrote:
But maybe also what makes the most sense in terms of development effort is for DXR to use the required equivalent tools from the Eclipse project, and convert their output to something it can understand.

This seems the preferable route to me.
I agree with others on producing DXR input from another tool. Java is much easier to deal with than C/C++. Various Java froend-ends seem to be a lot more mature than anything C++ has to offer.

And if you want to be dehydra-like, can hook up Rhino(http://www.mozilla.org/rhino/) to whatever java analysis framework you decide on.

Cheers,
Taras
_______________________________________________
dev-static-analysis mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-static-analysis

Reply via email to