On 05/03/12 15:01, Lionel Dricot wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
I would like to take this remark from Martyn Russell:
* Perhaps choose on one license for the project, currently 4 or so are
used.
How can we improve the license situation. In an ideal world, the project
would be under only one license. Is that doable? Which license should be
choosen?
I believe it is something we really need to improve.
I agree. Right not it's a bit confusing what license the project is.
In other Open Source projects, we've done this to make it easier for
people wanting to adopt it in their custom environments.
To give a quick summary of the current situation for DXR, currently
we're using using:
- MPLv2
- CCv2.5
- APLv2.0
But officially, the LICENSE file says the project follows the MIT license.
So,
1. Is MIT intended (not MPL)? If not, what is? AGPL?
2. Can we change the other code portions with the consent of the authors?
Thoughts?
--
Regards,
Martyn
Founder and CEO of Lanedo GmbH.
_______________________________________________
dev-static-analysis mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-static-analysis
