On 3/5/2012 10:30 AM, Martyn Russell wrote:
I agree. Right not it's a bit confusing what license the project is.
In other Open Source projects, we've done this to make it easier for
people wanting to adopt it in their custom environments.
To give a quick summary of the current situation for DXR, currently
we're using using:
- MPLv2
- CCv2.5
- APLv2.0
But officially, the LICENSE file says the project follows the MIT
license.
So,
1. Is MIT intended (not MPL)? If not, what is? AGPL?
2. Can we change the other code portions with the consent of the authors?
The original code written by David Humphrey and myself was intended to
be released under the MIT license.
The icon set is CC BY 2.5, which (as I understand) is effectively
similar to the MIT/3-clause BSD licenses.
Dojo and ply are both 3-clause BSD licenses, which (as I understand) are
effectively the same as the MIT license.
_______________________________________________
dev-static-analysis mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-static-analysis
