Ian G wrote:
> X.509 is a user concept, not a transaction concept.

Hmm, X.509 certs are simply a strong binding between a name of an entity
and a public key. Machines can be entities too like with server certs.

Still I'd agree that the original poster should rethink his concept. I'd
probably prefer the X.509-based user authc and lookup the machine on
which the transaction was performed based on other data.

Ciao, Michael.
--
dev-tech-crypto mailing list
dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto

Reply via email to