I suggest you learn about XML CDATA sections. Attila.
On 2008.03.27., at 16:55, Christian Vest Hansen wrote: > Hi, > > We're using Rhino to process some JavaScript that is hidden in an XML > document. This means that our javascript also has to be valid XML, in > the sense that it should not break anything but sit there and play > plain-text until Rhino comes along. > > This gives us some problems with operators such as <, >, <=, >=, <<, >>> and >>>, so we have to encode them with > and <, which is > tedious. > > I wonder if there happen to be alternative alphabetic names for these > operators that we could use instead? > > I think I recall seeing such operators, but maybe I'm wrong since > google couldn't find anything about them. > > > -- > Venlig hilsen / Kind regards, > Christian Vest Hansen. _______________________________________________ dev-tech-js-engine-rhino mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine-rhino
