On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 16:55 +0100, Christian Vest Hansen wrote: > Hi, > > We're using Rhino to process some JavaScript that is hidden in an XML > document. This means that our javascript also has to be valid XML, in > the sense that it should not break anything but sit there and play > plain-text until Rhino comes along. > > This gives us some problems with operators such as <, >, <=, >=, <<, > >> and >>>, so we have to encode them with > and <, which is > tedious. > > I wonder if there happen to be alternative alphabetic names for these > operators that we could use instead?
ummm, why would that be less tedious? But, as others have mentioned, you can wrap your JS in CDATA. You could also simple use a script/@src and call in the referenced file that contains the JS. Or you could write your JS in a way that does not need those characters, rather creates objects/arguments for a controller-type JS. best, -Rob > > I think I recall seeing such operators, but maybe I'm wrong since > google couldn't find anything about them. > > _______________________________________________ dev-tech-js-engine-rhino mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine-rhino
