On Sun, 24 Sep 2006, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
>
> Ian Hickson wrote:
> > I meant in the DOM, I didn't mean in the markup. I don't think we should
> > have any namespace declarations or namespace prefixes in text/html; I would
> > just have the HTML parser always support the MathML elements
> 
> I assume we have data that shows there would be no collisions with random
> user-defined tag names in random pages?  Including intranets?

Nope. Just blind faith. (Well, we have some evidence for the Web at large, 
but nothing substantial, only a billion pages or so. I'm working on a more 
substantial survey but that still won't cover the intranets.)

We didn't check that <canvas> wouldn't cause clashes, either.


> > I really don't think we want to introduce namespace prefixes or 
> > namespace declarations into tag soup. I think that would be a big 
> > mistake.
> 
> I agree with this, for what it's worth....  But perhaps we do want a way 
> to explicitly flag tag-soup documents as "this document uses MathML".

I don't see why. We don't want a flag for when people can use the storage 
APIs. Or when they can use <img> elements. Or whatever.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
_______________________________________________
dev-tech-layout mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-layout

Reply via email to