On 27/09/2006 10:16 AM, Ian Hickson wrote:

I'm happy to drop/add any tag to this list. Just give me the list you want.

OK.

For leaf nodes with following siblings, people will have to use end tags, as in:

   <foo><bar></bar><baz></baz></foo><quux></quux>

If we want to start adding actual leaf tags, I'd rather do this in a second stage, after we have a proof of concept. (I've so far avoided adding any new tags to the HTML5 parser spec, but eventually there will be a bunch we have to add.)

OK, I see.

The other issue are those 2000 entities that MathML has. You said that you are not a big fan of a namespace thingy on the root <html> element.

Is is okay to assume HTML5 (with its <!DOCTYPE html>) as supporting all W3C entities _by default_? We have a proof-of-concept of that in View Selection Source, BTW. It will display any entity it can.
http://lxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/content/base/public/nsIDocumentEncoder.idl#125
As VSS has underwent the test of time without major complaints, perhaps <!DOCTYPE html> could assume that too? If that is agreed, we are all clear.

The other remaining issue might be with style matching because <math> will then be internally in the MathML namespace whereas the HTML document is in the none namespace (at present), but we will see how it goes from there.
---
RBS

_______________________________________________
dev-tech-layout mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-layout

Reply via email to