Boris Zbarsky wrote: > Dave wrote: >> But when Mozilla implements @font-face and ensures it notes on all >> documentation and marketing of the feature that users and publishers >> must be careful to only use fonts that they are authorised to >> redistribute, it has a fair defence against such a lawsuit. > > The point is not to spend money on a lawsuit at all, not to be able to > win one after considerable expense. > >> I don't think a contractual dispute between a web publisher and a font >> developer for breaking the contractual license agreement would effect >> a browser developer. > > Given that you're not a lawyer, much less a copyright lawyer, it doesn't > seem to me like it matters much what you think here... This applies to > your entire lengthy legal analysis, for what it's worth. > >> Would such a threat have any basis? I don't think so > > See above.
One way to put it is this: Are you sure enough about this that you'd offer to pay the legal costs if mozilla got sued? I know I certainly wouldn't, no matter if I think the suit would have any basis or not. / Jonas _______________________________________________ dev-tech-layout mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-layout
