Dave wrote:
> The credibility of the W3C is critically important to its survival

Agreed.

 > I think the W3C will put its credibility at serious risk if it
 > publishes a Recommendation for a DRM format

Of course it also puts its credibility at risk if it publishes a Recommendation 
for something that UAs cannot implement for legal reasons.

In any case, there are credibility issues here no matter what.  See 
<http://dbaron.org/log/2006-08#e20060818a>.

> Treating draft versions of standards, even ISO ones, as final versions
> to bring software to users faster is not a disaster

It can be if the draft becomes widely-enough deployed that it becomes a 
de-facto 
standard.  This is especially a problem if the draft is unclear or 
self-contradictory and a particular implementation's quirks become de-facto 
standard.  Then everyone else has to reverse-engineer, defeating the entire 
point of having a standards organization.

> because software is so easily upgraded.

You mean browsers?  They're not _that_ easily upgraded.  See the IE6 usage 
figures.  And content is nearly impossibly to upgrade on any sort of large 
scale.

> Web Fonts are fast becoming a web standard, after a decade of
> anticipation from many publishers and users. Mozilla was founded and
> built up a reputation for promoting and innovating around web
> standards, and it ought to maintain that reputation.

For "useful" web standards (of which @font-face might well be one), yes.  But 
at 
this point there's all sorts of stuff coming out of the W3C that has little to 
nothing to do with the Web.  If David's blog post above didn't make that point, 
see all the stuff that's in the DOM "because it's not just web browsers that 
need to use the DOM".  There's a whole lot of server-side Java heritage in the 
DOM specs.

This is not to say that @font-face shouldn't be implemented, if the legal 
issues 
and such are resolved.  But to be honest, saying "there's a W3C spec that says 
so" just doesn't mean much nowadays.  Even if you ignore the fact that a lot of 
W3C stuff is pretty irrelevant to the Web, it doesn't help that there are W3C 
Recommendations that contradict each other...

-Boris
_______________________________________________
dev-tech-layout mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-layout

Reply via email to