On May 27, 4:03 pm, Boris Zbarsky <[email protected]> wrote: > No, not at all. The flexbox model is good for user interfaces. The > current CSS model is good for documents. Since both exist, both models > are needed.
Uhm... the fact that two things exist does not necessarily mean that a container capable of effectively carrying them both -cannot- exist. But that's just a sophism, I understand your argument and take your word for it. I guess as long as flexboxes can be contained in a cssboxes and viceversa we can all be pretty happy campers. =) I wonder if that's already possible... > In the flexbox model the basic concept is a lot more complicated, since > width and height are interdependent, no? Given a box with a defined orientation, I wouldn't have thought so! Can you give me a simple example of flexboxes where height and width interdependent? I can only make cases where once the direction is established (i.e. using an hbox or a vbox) everything flows sort of intuitively from there. =? Manu _______________________________________________ dev-tech-layout mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-layout
