On Tuesday 2016-09-27 12:24 -0700, L. David Baron wrote: > On Tuesday 2016-09-27 20:18 +0100, James Graham wrote: > > I think this argument is backwards. Today we don't run a recent copy of the > > CSS tests because there are technical issues preventing it from working with > > the reftest harness. It is not clear to me why this reorganisation would > > suddenly cause us to fix those issues when we could have done at any > > previous time with similar effort. > > Because you were doing the work on the approach that uses your test > harness, and we didn't have anybody assigned to do the other work?
And to clarify: I'm not objecting to merging csswg-test into wpt. I'm objecting to merging the result *back* into mozilla-central under the wptrunner harness. -David -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling in or walling out, And to whom I was like to give offense. - Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ dev-tech-layout mailing list dev-tech-layout@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-layout
