Next time, check to make sure gmail properly picked up to reply to the list
instead of just to Jason...

On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Nick Hurley <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Jason Duell <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> On 09/30/2011 12:47 PM, Patrick McManus wrote:
>>
>>> I thought this is why nick did necko net.
>>>
>>
>> Yes, sorry, we'd need both the access pattern described above AND
>> necko-net to get this to work.  The key is to have some test running that
>> has better hit rate with LRU on (and a small cache), and has network times
>> greater than disk access.  There's all sort of refinements that could be
>> made, but even something stupid would be progress as far as regression
>> coverage goes.
>>
>
> Unless I screwed something up horribly, it should be entirely (and easily)
> possible to take a manifest in the mode of Geoff's modified tp4m manifest,
> run it on a machine running web-page-replay (to save the page loads), and
> take that manifest + generated archive and shove them in a running neckonet,
> pair those with a low-bandwidth, high-latency network configuration, and
> we've got what we want.
>
_______________________________________________
dev-tech-network mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-network

Reply via email to