On Sep 25, 2013 3:48 AM, "Marcos Caceres" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Saturday, September 21, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>
> > We do allow updating icons on application update, so I don't actually
> > see any additional security risks with dynamic updates of icons.
> >
>
> The use case demonstrated in the JS library is one that seems very
closely related to notifications (i.e., compositing a number on top of an
icon to notify the use of some significant event). This seems better left
to the platform, specially as such things can be automatically handled (and
localised) by the user agent (and notifications can be stored safely across
restarts, thus allowing such decorations to be generated without needing
the application to be opened at all).

Yeah, there was a lot of talk about badges during the v1.0 release, but it
didn't make it and has fallen on the wayside since. Definitely something
that I think we should add though.

> I'm wondering if there are other use cases that are missing? E.g., would
we want to have something similar to MacOs's activity monitor, in which an
icon is updated dynamically as memory or CPU usage changes? This would
require some kind of background worker that is able to update the icon
periodically, which doesn't seem to me like a good idea on a constrained
device. Also, at least in FxOS, one is not able to view the icon of the
application while the application is running.

We couldn't support a background process constantly running. Bit yeah,
these are the types of use cases that could be interesting. Another example
is a calendar app which shows today's date in the icon.

> > Instead we keep the application name constant as long as the app is
> > installed.
> >
>
> Does this apply also to updates?

It does. We do not allow updates to change the name.

> If not - it seems logical that an application should be able to change
its name over versions, specially if it assists with usability and
findability across versions (i.e., "my crappy named app", after lot's of
user complaints, should be able to be renamed to "my awesomely named app" -
there may be other reasons why an app might need to be renamed, like an
accidental copyright violation in some region the author didn't know about,
etc.).

We discussed adding some sort of UI allowing the user to confirm a name
change in a non-obtrusive way, but didn't have the time to implement.
Something we should do though. UX help needed.

/ Jonas
_______________________________________________
dev-webapps mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-webapps

Reply via email to