Thanks Bill, I care about latency and throughput. First available result ordering is fine, though.
Does Guava just chain through a collection of iterators, completing one then moving to the next? Adam On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 3:06 PM, William Slacum < wilhelm.von.cl...@accumulo.net> wrote: > How are you expecting to get results back? Guava's Iterables could concat a > bunch of a Scanners together, if you didn't care about the throughput > aspect of it and simply wanted results from multiple tables. > > On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Adam Fuchs <afu...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Is anyone else pining for a multi-table isolated batch scanner, or is it > > just me? I like the automatic parallelism and balancing of the batch > > scanner, but I'm looking to maintain server-side state in my iterators > over > > long-running scans. I would also like to scan over multiple tables > > concurrently. Has anyone tried hacking something together with a pool of > > non-batch scanners? > > > > Adam > > >
