I'm asking in case I missed something in the documentation. This issue hasn't arisen before since I haven't shared tables before. When I attach an iterator to a table in the shell, it affects everyone (and every process) that accesses that table. Is there a standard of practice? Do people clone tables before developing new iterators or before exploring data with existing iterators?
- Can Iterators be made user-specific or shell-session-specif... David Medinets
- Re: Can Iterators be made user-specific or shell-sessi... John Vines
- Re: Can Iterators be made user-specific or shell-s... David Medinets
- Re: Can Iterators be made user-specific or she... David Medinets
- Re: Can Iterators be made user-specific or shell-sessi... Keith Turner
