Yes. But it seems like anything accessing that table also uses that iterator.
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 9:49 AM, John Vines <vi...@apache.org> wrote: > You can declare iterators to use at scan time. > > Sent from my phone, please pardon the typos and brevity. > On May 9, 2013 9:48 AM, "David Medinets" <david.medin...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I'm asking in case I missed something in the documentation. This issue > > hasn't arisen before since I haven't shared tables before. When I attach > an > > iterator to a table in the shell, it affects everyone (and every process) > > that accesses that table. Is there a standard of practice? Do people > clone > > tables before developing new iterators or before exploring data with > > existing iterators? > > >
