On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Sean Busbey <bus...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> Dropping JDK6 support is a pretty big deal. > > Is it worth making it a 2.0.0 feature instead of 1.6.0? > > If not, what would be the distinction for a 2.0.0? > One thing 2.0 could be used for is a new incompatible API. > > In the mean time we could explicitly change testing to be on JDK7 instead > of JDK6 as an initial step. > > > On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Given all the previous discussions about this, and assuming all points > > and counterpoints have already been sufficiently enumerated, I'd like > > to put it to a vote, explicitly: > > > > Should we switch to JDK 1.7 for Accumulo 1.6.0, to take advantage of > > newer features (ACCUMULO-905), or should we continue to require that > > Accumulo 1.6.0 run on JRE 1.6? > > > > -- > > Christopher L Tubbs II > > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii > > > > > > -- > Sean Busbey > Solutions Architect > Cloudera, Inc. > Phone: MAN-VS-BEARD >
