Dropping JDK6 support is a pretty big deal. Is it worth making it a 2.0.0 feature instead of 1.6.0?
If not, what would be the distinction for a 2.0.0? In the mean time we could explicitly change testing to be on JDK7 instead of JDK6 as an initial step. On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org> wrote: > Given all the previous discussions about this, and assuming all points > and counterpoints have already been sufficiently enumerated, I'd like > to put it to a vote, explicitly: > > Should we switch to JDK 1.7 for Accumulo 1.6.0, to take advantage of > newer features (ACCUMULO-905), or should we continue to require that > Accumulo 1.6.0 run on JRE 1.6? > > -- > Christopher L Tubbs II > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii > -- Sean Busbey Solutions Architect Cloudera, Inc. Phone: MAN-VS-BEARD
