We do need to get this settled. What about end of year target for release date and feature freeze date at end of Oct?
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Mike Drob <md...@mdrob.com> wrote: > I wanted to revive this conversation, since fall is fast approaching. One > reasonable target for a release date might be to try and get something done > before Hadoop World/Strata NY, which is the last week of October. That is a > bit sooner than initially planned, but would be a great bit of PR if it > were possible. Regardless, we need to seriously think about a feature > freeze date and get that agreed upon. > > Mike > > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Eric Newton <eric.new...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Absolutely this would be helpful! > > > > I have access to a 10-node cluster, and regularly run the continuous > ingest > > test, and the random walk tests for long periods (24-48 hours) prior to > > release. Running these sooner can shorten the release cycle quite a bit. > > > > If anyone has access to a medium-sized cluster (say, 100-500 nodes) that > > can be used for scale testing, even if only for a short period, or shared > > with other users, that would be helpful, too. > > > > -Eric > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Donald Miner <dmi...@clearedgeit.com > > >wrote: > > > > > I've talked to a couple of people about this in person, but figured I'd > > put > > > it out here. > > > > > > I have access to a 16 node cluster in my lab that we typically use for > > R&D > > > type projects. We have accumulo on it right now and is typically doing > > > something hadoop related. If there is a need to do testing of accumulo > > > release on bare metal with respectable equipment, let me know how we > > might > > > be able to contribute. > > > > > > -Don > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Dave Marion <dlmar...@comcast.net> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Historically, how long has it taken to complete testing of release > > > > candidates? Subtract that from 1 November and that should be the > target > > > > date. Based on 1.5.0, that means feature complete is tomorrow, right? > > :-) > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Sean Busbey [mailto:bus...@cloudera.com] > > > > Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 5:17 PM > > > > To: dev@accumulo.apache.org > > > > Subject: Schedule for 1.6.0 release? > > > > > > > > One of the action items out of the 1.6.0 discussion[1] was that we'd > > use > > > > the list to decide on a target release date, feature set, and > > incremental > > > > milestones for Accumulo 1.6.0. > > > > > > > > I know the initial plan was to aim for November, and right now Jira > > says > > > > as much[2]. > > > > > > > > That's only ~4 months away, so we should lay out some plans. When do > we > > > > need to target feature complete to meet that goal? When does code > > freeze > > > > need to happen? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1]: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/a/cloudera.com/document/d/1FkP2dDE4zzH1ou89_-qpW6-7dtBj9XdMRGjFnnLGrTI/edit > > > > [2]: > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO/fixforversion/12322468 > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Sean > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > * > > > *Donald Miner > > > Chief Technology Officer > > > ClearEdge IT Solutions, LLC > > > Cell: 443 799 7807 > > > www.clearedgeit.com > > > > > > -- > > > This communication is the property of ClearEdge IT Solutions, LLC and > > may > > > contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any review, > > > retransmissions, dissemination or other use of or taking of any action > in > > > reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the > > > intended recipient is prohibited. If you receive this communication in > > > error, please immediately notify the sender and destroy all copies of > the > > > communication and any attachments. > > > > > >
