----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19790/#review38922 -----------------------------------------------------------
I did not see any considerations for dealing with limited WAN capacity. If data ingest is local to the master, then it is feasible that the ingest bandwidth is much higher than can be efficiently acheived between e.g. Oregon and Virginia. We would also probably need some sequence function so that while clients reading from the slave might see stale information, they are not at risk of seeing Key combinations that have never existed. docs/src/main/resources/design/ACCUMULO-378-design.mdtext <https://reviews.apache.org/r/19790/#comment71246> Ends mid-sentence? docs/src/main/resources/design/ACCUMULO-378-design.mdtext <https://reviews.apache.org/r/19790/#comment71247> +1 - Mike Drob On March 28, 2014, 5:54 p.m., kturner wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/19790/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated March 28, 2014, 5:54 p.m.) > > > Review request for accumulo. > > > Bugs: ACCUMULO-378 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-378 > > > Repository: accumulo > > > Description > ------- > > ACCUMULO-378 Design document. Posting for review here, not meant for commit. > Final version of document should be posted on issue. > > > Diffs > ----- > > docs/src/main/resources/design/ACCUMULO-378-design.mdtext PRE-CREATION > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19790/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > kturner > >
