> On March 28, 2014, 6:06 p.m., Mike Drob wrote: > > I did not see any considerations for dealing with limited WAN capacity. If > > data ingest is local to the master, then it is feasible that the ingest > > bandwidth is much higher than can be efficiently acheived between e.g. > > Oregon and Virginia. We would also probably need some sequence function so > > that while clients reading from the slave might see stale information, they > > are not at risk of seeing Key combinations that have never existed.
Are you concerned about data being written in a different order on the slave? Or mutations being broken up? Or something else? - kturner ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19790/#review38922 ----------------------------------------------------------- On March 28, 2014, 5:54 p.m., kturner wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/19790/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated March 28, 2014, 5:54 p.m.) > > > Review request for accumulo. > > > Bugs: ACCUMULO-378 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-378 > > > Repository: accumulo > > > Description > ------- > > ACCUMULO-378 Design document. Posting for review here, not meant for commit. > Final version of document should be posted on issue. > > > Diffs > ----- > > docs/src/main/resources/design/ACCUMULO-378-design.mdtext PRE-CREATION > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19790/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > kturner > >
