Eric - Are you running with or without agitation?
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 9:41 AM, Eric Newton <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm running RW with ShortClean, and I have reported a number of issues > (ACCUMULO-2655). They may be issues with my test environment, or the > mechanism used to tear down the tests after they timeout. I'm still > investigating. > > -Eric > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Keith Turner <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm running a 24hr CI run w/o agitation on hour 14. This run has patches > > from ACCUMULO-2668, ACCUMULO-2667, and ACCUMULO-2670. > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 7:10 PM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> Can we circle back on where we are wrt required testing on 1.6.0? As is, > >> there's < 24hr remaining on the RC1 vote. > >> > >> I think we have outstanding: > >> > >> 1) Continuous Ingest run 24 hrs w/o agitation, verified > >> > >> 2) RandomWalk with LongClean for 24hrs > >> > >> 3) RandomWalk with LongClean and agitation for 24hrs > >> > >> I believe Mike D. finished the 72hr CI w/o agitation and Bill H. has a > #2 > >> in progress. > >> > >> I had #1 queued for this previous weekend on BigTop 0.7.0, but my > cluster > >> had NIC issues under stress and blew up. It did get to do some ingestion > >> and it did make attempts for hte full 24hr. so if it gets fixed in time > I > >> still could go through recovery and verification. > >> > >> Does anyone else have tests in progress that will fulfill #1 and #3? > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Bill Havanki < > [email protected] > >> >wrote: > >> > >> > I have been working randomwalk. I got through my issue with the > >> Concurrent > >> > rw test [1]. I am now seeing a problem with Shard [2] which I'm > rerunning > >> > to get more information. > >> > > >> > I haven't seen the particular issues Eric encountered [3]. > >> > > >> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2621 > >> > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2657 > >> > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2655 > >> > > >> > > >> > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Josh Elser <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > > I had a successful run of all UTs and ITs on Tuesday (against > 479a36bd) > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > On 4/3/14, 1:58 PM, Sean Busbey wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> Cloudera has finished successfully verifying a 24 hour Continuous > >> Ingest > >> > >> Test with agitation on an HA configured cluster with 7 nodes and 5 > >> > workers > >> > >> against 1.6.0 as of commit 3a1b38. > >> > >> > >> > >> We'd like to coordinate with anyone else who's working through the > >> > release > >> > >> criteria. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > // Bill Havanki > >> > // Solutions Architect, Cloudera Govt Solutions > >> > // 443.686.9283 > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Sean > >> >
