I'm running LongClean RW without aggitation.
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Mike Drob <[email protected]> wrote: > Eric - > > Are you running with or without agitation? > > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 9:41 AM, Eric Newton <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I'm running RW with ShortClean, and I have reported a number of issues > > (ACCUMULO-2655). They may be issues with my test environment, or the > > mechanism used to tear down the tests after they timeout. I'm still > > investigating. > > > > -Eric > > > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Keith Turner <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I'm running a 24hr CI run w/o agitation on hour 14. This run has > patches > > > from ACCUMULO-2668, ACCUMULO-2667, and ACCUMULO-2670. > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 7:10 PM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > >> Can we circle back on where we are wrt required testing on 1.6.0? As > is, > > >> there's < 24hr remaining on the RC1 vote. > > >> > > >> I think we have outstanding: > > >> > > >> 1) Continuous Ingest run 24 hrs w/o agitation, verified > > >> > > >> 2) RandomWalk with LongClean for 24hrs > > >> > > >> 3) RandomWalk with LongClean and agitation for 24hrs > > >> > > >> I believe Mike D. finished the 72hr CI w/o agitation and Bill H. has a > > #2 > > >> in progress. > > >> > > >> I had #1 queued for this previous weekend on BigTop 0.7.0, but my > > cluster > > >> had NIC issues under stress and blew up. It did get to do some > ingestion > > >> and it did make attempts for hte full 24hr. so if it gets fixed in > time > > I > > >> still could go through recovery and verification. > > >> > > >> Does anyone else have tests in progress that will fulfill #1 and #3? > > >> > > >> > > >> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Bill Havanki < > > [email protected] > > >> >wrote: > > >> > > >> > I have been working randomwalk. I got through my issue with the > > >> Concurrent > > >> > rw test [1]. I am now seeing a problem with Shard [2] which I'm > > rerunning > > >> > to get more information. > > >> > > > >> > I haven't seen the particular issues Eric encountered [3]. > > >> > > > >> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2621 > > >> > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2657 > > >> > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2655 > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Josh Elser <[email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > I had a successful run of all UTs and ITs on Tuesday (against > > 479a36bd) > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > On 4/3/14, 1:58 PM, Sean Busbey wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > >> Cloudera has finished successfully verifying a 24 hour Continuous > > >> Ingest > > >> > >> Test with agitation on an HA configured cluster with 7 nodes and > 5 > > >> > workers > > >> > >> against 1.6.0 as of commit 3a1b38. > > >> > >> > > >> > >> We'd like to coordinate with anyone else who's working through > the > > >> > release > > >> > >> criteria. > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > -- > > >> > // Bill Havanki > > >> > // Solutions Architect, Cloudera Govt Solutions > > >> > // 443.686.9283 > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Sean > > >> > > >
