On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Sean Busbey <bus...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> Hey Keith, > > Some questions in-line > > On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Keith Turner <ke...@deenlo.com> wrote: > > > -1 > > > > I am opposed to the tag, because I think what it communicates to users is > > confusing. I'm in favor of what Christopher suggested. > > > > > Specifically, this would be just dropping the HEAD without tagging and > referencing the commit hash? > correct > > > > > I was undecided about the general concept of 1.4 EOL, I am still working > > w/ some users who are still using 1.4 in the short term. Should they > run > > into a serious bug, we will very likely fix it. I discussed this > situation > > w/ Christopher and he suggested if this situation were to occur we could > > simply post a patch jira. That plan sounds good w/ me and makes me > > comfortable w/ 1.4 EOL now. > > > > > > > I am also working with users who are likely to be using 1.4 in the > short-to-medium term. :) > > In this case do you just mean a jira that contains a patch that users could > apply themselves (or have applied by some code maintainer)? > yes. > > -- > Sean >
