----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20422/#review45965 -----------------------------------------------------------
docs/src/main/resources/RB.md <https://reviews.apache.org/r/20422/#comment81098> I've found descriptive ids for links to be more maintainable than integer 1-ups. Example: replace [instance][1] with [instance][RB_INSTANCE] docs/src/main/resources/RB.md <https://reviews.apache.org/r/20422/#comment81099> s/can be used in the/can be used to support development in the/ docs/src/main/resources/RB.md <https://reviews.apache.org/r/20422/#comment81100> s/use RB for all but the most trivial of patches/use RB for non-trivial patches and any time one seeks feedback on code/ docs/src/main/resources/RB.md <https://reviews.apache.org/r/20422/#comment81103> Add line: * Avoid submitting generated code for review, if it can be reproduced by a reviewer. docs/src/main/resources/RB.md <https://reviews.apache.org/r/20422/#comment81105> Consistent word wrapping makes this more readable. (line too long; see also line 96) docs/src/main/resources/RB.md <https://reviews.apache.org/r/20422/#comment81107> In practice, nobody does this. Consider omitting this suggestion. - Christopher Tubbs On April 25, 2014, 10:39 a.m., Bill Havanki wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/20422/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated April 25, 2014, 10:39 a.m.) > > > Review request for accumulo. > > > Bugs: ACCUMULO-1834 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1834 > > > Repository: accumulo > > > Description > ------- > > A proposed set of guidelines for using Review Board, in deference to our > recently-approved and improved bylaws. > > > Diffs > ----- > > docs/src/main/resources/RB.md PRE-CREATION > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20422/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Bill Havanki > >
