We thought about this for text indexing. We found we could use Constraints as they trigger on write. Seems like a bit of a hack and i have no idea if it would blow something up.
Does constraint execution happen on tablet side or client side? > On Jul 23, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Roshan Punnoose <rosh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Is there a way to tie into the write process in Accumulo? Maybe just use an > Iterator that worked on compaction to send data to blur/solr? I have seen > something similar in Cassandra, a data hook to save data in Solr. > > >> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Nehal Mehta <nehal...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> We were trying to do so, but adding visibility while adding/searching >> documents needs lot more thinking. Adding visibility to core search engine >> needs changes to algorithm and that does not make it very scalable. >> Integration besides granular visibility is very doable. and we had taken >> inspiration from Solandra. >> >> Obviously if we can get it done it adds lot of value. I believe Sqrrl >> people have already done it, are they thinking to open source it anytime in >> future? >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Donald Miner <dmi...@clearedgeit.com> >> wrote: >> >>> We briefly toyed with blur on accumulo but didnt get too far just because >>> it was obe. I think that would be cool. >>> >>>> On Jul 17, 2014, at 3:06 PM, Josh Elser <josh.el...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> It's definitely possible. I remember hearing about someone doing lucene >>> on top of Accumulo once, but I don't recall seeing a nice package with a >>> bow on top. >>>> >>>>> On 7/17/14, 2:53 PM, THORMAN, ROBERT D wrote: >>>>> What lexical search package (like lucene/solr) has anyone put on top >> of >>> accumulo? Is this possible or does everyone just index log files and >>> documents? >>>>> >>>>> v/r >>>>> Bob Thorman >>>>> Principal Big Data Engineer >>>>> AT&T Big Data CoE >>>>> 2900 W. Plano Parkway >>>>> Plano, TX 75075 >>>>> 972-658-1714 >>
