Ingest to a queue. Have two processes subscribe to the queue. One pushing into Accumulo and the other pushing into SolrCloud. Why tightly couple the capabilities?
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Roshan Punnoose <rosh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Is there a way to tie into the write process in Accumulo? Maybe just use an > Iterator that worked on compaction to send data to blur/solr? I have seen > something similar in Cassandra, a data hook to save data in Solr. > > > On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Nehal Mehta <nehal...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> We were trying to do so, but adding visibility while adding/searching >> documents needs lot more thinking. Adding visibility to core search engine >> needs changes to algorithm and that does not make it very scalable. >> Integration besides granular visibility is very doable. and we had taken >> inspiration from Solandra. >> >> Obviously if we can get it done it adds lot of value. I believe Sqrrl >> people have already done it, are they thinking to open source it anytime in >> future? >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Donald Miner <dmi...@clearedgeit.com> >> wrote: >> >> > We briefly toyed with blur on accumulo but didnt get too far just because >> > it was obe. I think that would be cool. >> > >> > > On Jul 17, 2014, at 3:06 PM, Josh Elser <josh.el...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > >> > > It's definitely possible. I remember hearing about someone doing lucene >> > on top of Accumulo once, but I don't recall seeing a nice package with a >> > bow on top. >> > > >> > >> On 7/17/14, 2:53 PM, THORMAN, ROBERT D wrote: >> > >> What lexical search package (like lucene/solr) has anyone put on top >> of >> > accumulo? Is this possible or does everyone just index log files and >> > documents? >> > >> >> > >> v/r >> > >> Bob Thorman >> > >> Principal Big Data Engineer >> > >> AT&T Big Data CoE >> > >> 2900 W. Plano Parkway >> > >> Plano, TX 75075 >> > >> 972-658-1714 >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >>
